GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K2000D

When comparing GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTX 275 Check Price

Quadro K2000D Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 275	Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 275 has 329% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000D.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000D - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000D.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000D - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K2000D is 192 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 275.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 2866 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	7−8
ultra / 1080p	4−5	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	18−20
medium / 1080p	8−9	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	10−12	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	140−150
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	50−55	55−60
QHD / 1440p	27−30	30−35
4K / 2160p	27−30	27−30
high / 768p	75−80	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	8−9	9−10
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	18−20	21−24
medium / 1080p	8−9	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−12
low / 720p	60−65	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Fortnite is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
medium / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	4−5	5−6
ultra / 1080p	3−4	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	14−16
medium / 1080p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
high / 1080p	85−90	90−95
ultra / 1080p	80−85	80−85
medium / 1080p	90−95	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	14−16
medium / 1080p	10−12	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	24−27	27−30
medium / 768p	16−18	18−20
high / 1080p	9−10	10−11
ultra / 1080p	6−7	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
medium / 768p	40−45	45−50
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
high / 768p	35−40	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000D in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 275.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 275	Quadro K2000D
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GT200B	GK107
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	15 January 2009	1 March 2013
Pipelines	240	384
Core clock speed	1404 MHz	954 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	50.6 billion/sec	30.53
Floating-point performance	673.9 gflops	732.7 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	202 mm
Memory bus width	448 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1134 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	127.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	3.0	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
CUDA cores	240
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		31 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K2000D

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares