GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K3100M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K3100M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 275 stacks up against Quadro K3100M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K3100M
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 192% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 892 GB more memory, than Quadro K3100M.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 698 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K3100M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3100M is 2066 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K3100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
180−190
medium / 768p
100−110
150−160
ultra / 1080p
50−55
80−85
QHD / 1440p
27−30
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
75−80
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
100−105
medium / 768p
55−60
80−85
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
20−22
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
80−85
medium / 1080p
21−24
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Fortnite is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
20−22
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
70−75
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
40−45
medium / 768p
16−18
24−27
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
40−45
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
high / 768p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3100M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K3100M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Code name
GT200B
N15E-Q1-A2
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
23 July 2013
Pipelines
240
768
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
706 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
45.18
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
1,084 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12
Shader Model
4.0
5
OpenGL
3.0
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
