GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K5000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 275 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 119% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 892 GB more memory, than Quadro K5000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 698 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 1866 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
100−110
180−190
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
55−60
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
75−80
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
ultra / 1080p
30−35
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
80−85
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
55−60
medium / 768p
16−18
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
20−22
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K5000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Code name
GT200B
N14E-Q5
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
1 June 2012
Pipelines
240
1344
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
706 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
67.31
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
1,615 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
