GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro M3000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro M3000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro M3000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 192% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 892 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 354 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 3866 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
130−140
250−260
medium / 768p
100−110
220−230
ultra / 1080p
50−55
180−190
QHD / 1440p
27−30
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
75−80
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
18−20
80−85
medium / 1080p
8−9
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
60−65
180−190
medium / 1080p
21−24
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
140−150
medium / 768p
45−50
120−130
high / 1080p
12−14
70−75
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
10−12
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
130−140
medium / 768p
16−18
85−90
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 421% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell
Code name
GT200B
GM204
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
2 October 2015
Pipelines
240
1,024
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
67.20
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
2,150 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12
Shader Model
4.0
5.0
OpenGL
3.0
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price