GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro M500M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro M500M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 275 stacks up against Quadro M500M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro M500M
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 630% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M500M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M500M is 2870 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
10−12
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
12−14
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Battlefield 5 is 87% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
85−90
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
QHD / 1440p
27−30
35−40
4K / 2160p
27−30
18−20
high / 768p
75−80
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
8−9
1−2
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
10−12
medium / 1080p
8−9
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
14−16
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
low / 720p
60−65
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−12
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
6−7
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
4−5
1−2
ultra / 1080p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
6−7
medium / 1080p
6−7
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
85−90
70−75
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
10−12
6−7
medium / 1080p
10−12
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
24−27
14−16
medium / 768p
16−18
10−11
high / 1080p
9−10
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
high / 768p
35−40
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Quadro M500M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro M500M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell
Code name
GT200B
GM108
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
15 December 2015
Pipelines
240
384
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
1029 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
17.98
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
863.2 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
4004 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12
Shader Model
4.0
5.0
OpenGL
3.0
4.5
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.0
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
