GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Radeon RX Vega M GH, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 275 stacks up against Radeon RX Vega M GH, check out specs charts below.
Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 119% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GH uses IGP interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 892 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 341 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 466 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
10−12
55−60
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
130−140
250−260
medium / 768p
100−110
220−230
ultra / 1080p
50−55
180−190
QHD / 1440p
27−30
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
70−75
high / 768p
75−80
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
55−60
110−120
ultra / 1080p
30−35
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
18−20
80−85
medium / 1080p
8−9
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−11
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
60−65
180−190
medium / 1080p
21−24
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
10−12
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
12−14
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
50−55
140−150
medium / 768p
45−50
120−130
high / 1080p
12−14
70−75
ultra / 1080p
6−7
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
90−95
130−140
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
10−12
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
24−27
130−140
medium / 768p
16−18
85−90
high / 1080p
9−10
45−50
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 421% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
high / 768p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Vega
Code name
GT200B
Vega Kaby Lake-G
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
15 January 2009
7 January 2018
Pipelines
240
1536
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
1063 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
114.2
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
3,656 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
204.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price