GeForce GTX 275 vs Tesla C2075

When choosing between GeForce GTX 275 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 275 and Tesla C2075.

GeForce GTX 275 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 275	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	6 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 12% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 275.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 275 has 890 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 830 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 238 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 275.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	8−9	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	10−12	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	130−140	210−220
medium / 768p	100−110	190−200
ultra / 1080p	50−55	100−110
QHD / 1440p	27−30	65−70
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	75−80	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	8−9	21−24
ultra / 1080p	7−8	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	3−4	6−7
low / 720p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	8−9	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−11	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	60−65	110−120
medium / 1080p	21−24	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	12−14	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−12	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	10−11
low / 720p	24−27	60−65
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	50−55	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	80−85
high / 1080p	12−14	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	4−5	10−12
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	6−7	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	30−35
medium / 1080p	10−12	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	24−27	60−65
medium / 768p	16−18	35−40
high / 1080p	9−10	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	35−40	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 275.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 275	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GT200B	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	15 January 2009	25 July 2011
Pipelines	240	448
Core clock speed	1404 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	50.6 billion/sec	32.14
Floating-point performance	673.9 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	248 mm
Memory bus width	448 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1134 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	127.0 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	3.0	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0
CUDA cores	240
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 275 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares