FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 280
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 280 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 280 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 280 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 236 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 574% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 280 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 280 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 280 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 280 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 571 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280 - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 207 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 280 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GT200 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 16 June 2008 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1296 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 48.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1107 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 141.7 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |