FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 280
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 280, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 280.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 280
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 236 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 4% more power consumption, than FireStream 9370.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 280 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 471 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280 - by 65 nm process technology.
- FireStream 9370 is 257 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 280.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3493 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Cypress | GT200 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 16 June 2008 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1296 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 48.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1107 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 141.7 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M