GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs GeForce GTX 280
When choosing between GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and GeForce GTX 280, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and GeForce GTX 280.
GeForce GTX 280
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 236 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 57% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and GeForce GTX 280 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 280 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 280 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 796 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and GeForce GTX 280 are manufactured by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 307 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and GeForce GTX 280 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Fortnite is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | NB9E-GTX | GT200 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 15 July 2008 | 16 June 2008 |
Pipelines | 224 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1296 MHz |
Transistor count | 3016 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1107 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs GeForce 945A
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce 945A
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M