GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 460M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460M.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 372% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1535 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 460M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 54 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 143 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Dota 2 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 460M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 460M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GT200 | N11E-GS |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 3 September 2010 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 16.1 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | + |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |