GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 480M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 480M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 480M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 480M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 136% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 480M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 480M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 480M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 480M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 446 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 480M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 480M is 93 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Fortnite is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT200 | N11E-GTX-A3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 25 May 2010 |
Pipelines | 240 | 352 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 18.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 598.4 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |