GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 485M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 485M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 485M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 136% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 485M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 485M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 485M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 485M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 912 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 485M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 485M is 393 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 485M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 485M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 485M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT200 | N12E-GTX-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 6 January 2010 |
Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 384 |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 36.8 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 96.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655