GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 670M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 670M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 670M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 214% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 698 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 670M is 393 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 670M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GT200 | N13E-GS1-LP |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 240 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 598 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 33.5 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 192bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 240 | 336 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |