GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce MX150
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce MX150, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against GeForce MX150, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce MX150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce MX150 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 2260% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX150 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX150 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX150 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 172 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 4901 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce MX150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce MX150 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GT200 | N17S-G1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 16 May 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1532 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,127 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce MX150 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GeForce MX150 vs Iris Graphics 540
- GeForce MX150 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000