GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Graphics 5100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Graphics 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 686% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 1096 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Graphics 5100 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Fortnite is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GT200 | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 240 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro 3000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850