GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Graphics 540
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Graphics 540 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 540 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 1473% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 63 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 540 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 540 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 996 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 540 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Graphics 540 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GT200 | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |