GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Graphics 550
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Graphics 550. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Graphics 550. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Graphics 550 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 1473% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 550 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 63 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 550 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Graphics 550 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 996 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 550 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Graphics 550 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Graphics 550 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GT200 | Skylake GT3e |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 52.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |