GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 1473% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 996 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Fortnite is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Plus Graphics 645 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake |
Code name | GT200 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 10 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 240 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 50.40 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R9 M270X
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5850
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon R9 M270X