GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Plus Graphics 650. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Plus Graphics 650. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 1473% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 996 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GT200 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 883 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650