GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 996 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Dota 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Fortnite is 143% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 255% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GT200 | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 240 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R7 360
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 7790
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon R7 360
- Iris Plus Graphics G7 Ice Lake 64 EU vs Radeon HD 7790