GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Iris Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GT200 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 240 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000