GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro 3000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro 3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro 3000M.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 214% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 3000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 846 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 482 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GT200 | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |