GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K1000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro K1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 424% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K1000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 446 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 693 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Quadro K1000M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro K1000M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200 | N14P-Q1 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 240 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |