GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K5100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K5100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K5100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 136% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 525 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro K5100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 2493 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Dota 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Fortnite is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200 | N15E-Q5-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 98.69 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | + |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |