GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro M4000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro M4000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro M4000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro M4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 136% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro M4000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 321 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 3905 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro M4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro M4000M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GT200 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1,280 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 975 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |