GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro P2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro P2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro P2000 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro P2000 Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 81 MHz higher, than Quadro P2000 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 4901 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro P2000 Max Q | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GT200 | GP107GL |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 July 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |