GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro P3200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro P3200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro P3200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6084 MB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6083 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 588 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 5901 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 198% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro P3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 1400% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 487% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 844% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 437% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 1466% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 860% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1057% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GT200 | N18E-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 27 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |