GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro P500
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro P500, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and Quadro P500.
GeForce GTX 280
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro P500 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 686% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro P500 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 159 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 3905 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Fortnite is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Quadro P500 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GT200 | GP108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 14 November 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 21.25 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12.1 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.0.1 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |