GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon 520
When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon 520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon 520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon 520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 372% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon 520 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 266 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 520 is 1143 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Radeon 520. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon 520 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GT200 | Oland |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,040 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | + |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Check Price |