GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 8750M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8750M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8750M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon HD 8750M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 676 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8750M is 893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Fortnite is 13% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200 | Mars Pro |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 18.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |