GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 8870M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8870M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against Radeon HD 8870M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon HD 8870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8870M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon HD 8870M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8870M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 8870M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8870M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8870M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 571 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8870M.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8870M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8870M is 3393 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Fortnite is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon HD 8870M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200 | Venus |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 18 December 2012 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 107 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |