GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon Pro 555
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon Pro 555 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 555 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon Pro 555 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 555 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 555 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 214% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 555 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 555 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 441 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 555.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 3973 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon Pro 555 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 357% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon Pro 555 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 855 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,306 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 81.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |