GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon Pro 560
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon Pro 560, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against Radeon Pro 560, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 214% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 389 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 3973 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |