GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon Pro 580X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon Pro 580X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon Pro 580X.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon Pro 580X
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon Pro 580X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 580X.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 580X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 580X has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 580X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 196 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 580X.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 580X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 580X is 5673 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 716% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Battlefield 5 is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 198% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 580X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Far Cry 5 is 1400% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Fortnite is 475% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Forza Horizon 4 is 844% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Grand Theft Auto V is 437% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Metro Exodus is 1433% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 800% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1028% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 580X in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon Pro 580X | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GT200 | Polaris 20 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 18 March 2019 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 172.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |