GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon PRO WX 3100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 263% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 4893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon PRO WX 3100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 143% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |