GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
When comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon Pro WX 4130, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 5893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Battlefield 5 is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon Pro WX 4130 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Dota 2 is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Fortnite is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4130 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200 | Polaris |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |