GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R9 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 396 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 18 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GT200 | Tropo |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Graphics 6100
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Iris Graphics 6100
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870