GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon RX 560 mobile
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon RX 560 mobile. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon RX 560 mobile. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon RX 560 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 560 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 560 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon RX 560 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 329% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 560 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 560 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon RX 560 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 121 MHz higher, than Radeon RX 560 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560 mobile is 4893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Dota 2 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 388% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in World of Tanks is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon RX 560 mobile | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 5 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 58.97 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 2,462 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI