FirePro V4900 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 280M SLI will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
150 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - with G9x.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 215 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 3050 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
1−2
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 212% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
110−120
180−190
medium / 768p
90−95
150−160
ultra / 1080p
40−45
80−85
QHD / 1440p
24−27
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
80−85
ultra / 1080p
24−27
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 60% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
14−16
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
85−90
medium / 1080p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 110% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
65−70
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
21−24
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
−
95−100
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
20−22
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 70% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
40−45
medium / 768p
10−11
27−30
high / 1080p
5−6
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−33
high / 768p
30−33
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 38% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Architecture
TeraScale 2
G9x
Code name
Turks
N10E-GTX
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 November 2011
2 March 2009
Pipelines
480
256
Core clock speed
800 MHz
585 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
950 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
