FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against GeForce GTX 280M SLI, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 40 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 1036 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 177% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 53% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 220% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 136% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
Architecture | TeraScale | G9x |
Code name | RV770 | N10E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 800 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 585 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 950 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GT 650M
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 960A
- FireStream 9250 vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Iris Graphics 550