FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 165 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2650 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 78% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 93% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 16% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | G9x |
| Code name | RV770 | N10E-GTX |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1508 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |