GeForce 840A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
When choosing between GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 280M SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
GeForce 840A
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 840A | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 280M SLI have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 444 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce 840A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 840A is 1052 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 840A and GeForce GTX 280M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 141% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 48% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 840A | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | G9x |
| Code name | GM108 | N10E-GTX |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |