GeForce 920A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920A and GeForce GTX 280M SLI, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920A stacks up against GeForce GTX 280M SLI, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 920A
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 354% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A and GeForce GTX 280M SLI have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 369 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 920A is 1052 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 220% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | G9x |
| Code name | GK208B | N10E-GTX |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1508 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.5 | + |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |