GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 57% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 711 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 157 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and GeForce GTX 280M SLI have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | GeForce GTX 280M SLI | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
Code name | GT200 | N10E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 240 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 585 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 950 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Iris Graphics 550