GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 295
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 295, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280M SLI stacks up against GeForce GTX 295, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 92% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 657 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 295 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 49 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 295 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N10E-GTX | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 256 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 585 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275