GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 715 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | N10E-GTX | GF104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 256 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 585 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M