GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 850A
When comparing GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 850A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 850A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 850A
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 850A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 850A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 850A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 317 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 850A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 850 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce GTX 850A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | GeForce GTX 850A | |
Architecture | G9x | Maxwell |
Code name | N10E-GTX | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 585 MHz | 902 MHz |
Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.44 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce 840M
- GeForce GTX 850A vs Radeon HD 7670A
- GeForce GTX 850A vs GeForce 840M