GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Quadro CX
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Quadro CX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Quadro CX.
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro CX is 17 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Quadro CX are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 650 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 285% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 73% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 145% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 262% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N10E-GTX | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 585 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Iris Graphics 550
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Quadro CX vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GT 645M
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics