GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 280M SLI will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 280M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 280M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 145 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 3650 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Fortnite is 133% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 228% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280M SLI in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280M SLI | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N10E-GTX | Oland |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 30 June 2016 |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 585 MHz | 730 MHz |
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs GeForce GTX 960A
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Iris Graphics 550
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280M SLI vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620